Contact Sales:
sales@comodogroup.com
Telephone:
Tel: + 1.888.266.6361
Tel: + 1.703.581.6361
In October 2005, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) updated new guidance stating that current authentication methods are not sufficiently secure. The FFIEC recommended that banks have a plan to implement “stronger” forms of authentication (i.e. two factor authentication as opposed to one) by the end of 2006. They also recommended that banks put in place a “mutual” or multifactor authentication solution whereby the banks not only authenticates its online customers, but the customer can authenticate the banks legitimate website.
The most urgent requirement for organizations in 2006 is for the bank to conduct a complete risk assessment to identify vulnerabilities. They recommend that institutions carefully research security authentication methods that will be reliable, scalable and interoperable with existing and future infrastructures.
The FFIEC also recommends that banks put in place a “mutual” or two factor authentication solution whereby the bank not only authenticates its online customers, but the customer can authenticate the bank website.
Online fraudsters have technologically outpaced the security measures that most financial institutions have put in place.
This model (see Figure 1) visualizes the reciprocity of the mutual authentication model – Bank can authenticate the user (BTU) and the User can authenticate the Bank (UTB). Much of the FFIEC Guidelines (and, not surprisingly, the industry's solutions) focus on the BTU authentication aspect of the equation while ignoring the need for Users to authenticate the bank. Why has this occurred? Largely because it was assumed that SSL padlock were enough to establish site legitimacy. However, that is simply not the case. SSL certificates do not always authenticate the business legitimacy of the site or worse still the padlock can be faked. However, unless the User authenticates the bank as a legitimate site, subsequent solutions will provide no security to the customer and their financial details may be stolen.

Comodo Solution for customer to authenticate the bank: Content Verification Certificate
CVCs, as part of Comodo’s mutual, multifactor authentication solution, ensure that digital content (such as website login boxes and graphics) and site identity can be verified in real time and without disrupting the normal transaction process.
Comodo's See Verify Trust technology takes the bank's web content, IP addresses and domain names, and embeds them into a digital Content Verification Certificate (CVC). Online banking customers simply roll their cursor over the website's content that contains a CVC, and Verification Engine displays a green border outside the browser. CVC’s are one half of Comodo’s two factor authentication solution.
Using the proven PKI platform for security authentication of websites to end users, CVCs prove that a bank site has been validated and is safe for online banking.
CVC’s can protect content such as:
Comodo Solution for bank to authenticate the customer: PC Certificates
Digital Client certificates are an easy to deploy, affordable, secure and convenient solution for banks to authenticate customers. Digital PC certificates can be delivered electronically while providing strong two factor authentication of users. They authenticate the user's pc and identity code.
They can be stored directly on a user's computer or, for portability, they can be stored on smart cards, tokens or USB devices. A PKI client certificate provides strong authentication of users and assures the bank that the user logging in is indeed the bank’s customer. Comodo digital Client certificates are the other half of Comodo’s two factor authentication solution.
Learn more about FFIEC compliance and Comodo’s two factor authentication and multifactor authentication solutions.